<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Connected World Media - Latest Comments in Twitter is like a ball of clay</title><link>http://connectedworldmedia.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://connectedworldmedia.disqus.com/twitter_is_like_a_ball_of_clay/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:03:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter is like a ball of clay</title><link>http://connectedworldmedia.com/2009/01/twitter-is-like-a-ball-of-clay/#comment-12600554</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The key is to realize that there is nothing to "get."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twitter just is. It is what you make of it. It is a mirror. Chaos theory teaches us from simplicity comes complexity. That's why Twitter works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:03:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is like a ball of clay</title><link>http://connectedworldmedia.com/2009/01/twitter-is-like-a-ball-of-clay/#comment-12600553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've been conducting a semi-controlled experiment by asking different technology-savvy groups how they describe Twitter to other people.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nathan Rome pointed me to your post, and I really like how you describe Twitter. What a tool is, and how you use (or abuse) it are two different things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I also resisted Twitter for a long time, but I'm slowly coming round to the real benefits for using it in certain situations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll be posting some of the responses back at my blog, so take a look at:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://charliefourwhiskey.com/2009/01/06/twitter-question/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://charliefourwhiskey.com/2009/01/06/twitter-question/"&gt;http://charliefourwhiskey.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Robert&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Ford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:53:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is like a ball of clay</title><link>http://connectedworldmedia.com/2009/01/twitter-is-like-a-ball-of-clay/#comment-12600552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;good article, atrocious grammar and spelling!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kev</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:38:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter is like a ball of clay</title><link>http://connectedworldmedia.com/2009/01/twitter-is-like-a-ball-of-clay/#comment-12600551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post.  Ball of clay is perfect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shaun Dakin&lt;br&gt;@IsCool&lt;br&gt;@EndTheRobocalls&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Dakin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>